<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sampler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bios</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-9242</link>
		<dc:creator>Bios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-9242</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this great plugin. I&#039;ve ported it for CoGe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this great plugin. I&#8217;ve ported it for CoGe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-6249</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-6249</guid>
		<description>Alex, limit is because you&#039;ll likely start running out of memory with more. You can have multiple instances of the plugin, what you&#039;re describing sounds doable. Not sure what you mean with the skipping, but you can set the Time Base to external in Quartz Composer and manipulate patch time if you want to skip within the recorded buffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, limit is because you&#8217;ll likely start running out of memory with more. You can have multiple instances of the plugin, what you&#8217;re describing sounds doable. Not sure what you mean with the skipping, but you can set the Time Base to external in Quartz Composer and manipulate patch time if you want to skip within the recorded buffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-6229</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-6229</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

First of all, thank you this is amazing. I stumbled across it while looking for something else, but I have actually been looking for this for ages.

Is the limit of 30 seconds recording time there for a particular reason, i.e hardware limitations or would the plugin function if the recording was say 1 minute to 2 minutes? Also is there a way to record 3 or four clips and have them all repeat skipping out the bits in the middle?

Thank you for an amazing plugin.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>First of all, thank you this is amazing. I stumbled across it while looking for something else, but I have actually been looking for this for ages.</p>
<p>Is the limit of 30 seconds recording time there for a particular reason, i.e hardware limitations or would the plugin function if the recording was say 1 minute to 2 minutes? Also is there a way to record 3 or four clips and have them all repeat skipping out the bits in the middle?</p>
<p>Thank you for an amazing plugin.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>Hi. The bottleneck you&#039;re hitting is likely in transferring video from the GPU to main memory; CPU usage should always be minimal. I have an update in the works which may improve things for you: if you&#039;re interested in testing it, drop me an e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. The bottleneck you&#8217;re hitting is likely in transferring video from the GPU to main memory; CPU usage should always be minimal. I have an update in the works which may improve things for you: if you&#8217;re interested in testing it, drop me an e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-5206</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-5206</guid>
		<description>Great patch. I would like to use it more in VDMX.
Is there something you can do to optimise its performance in terms of Multitasking?
Running several instances of the thing now makes the overall frame rate drop significantly. But monitoring the CPU usage there is plenty left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great patch. I would like to use it more in VDMX.<br />
Is there something you can do to optimise its performance in terms of Multitasking?<br />
Running several instances of the thing now makes the overall frame rate drop significantly. But monitoring the CPU usage there is plenty left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>Hi

The slow-down is as it allocates memory beyond available RAM - so the real solution is more RAM. I could improve the way it asks for memory though - I&#039;ll think about that for a future update...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>The slow-down is as it allocates memory beyond available RAM &#8211; so the real solution is more RAM. I could improve the way it asks for memory though &#8211; I&#8217;ll think about that for a future update&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackburst</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-3894</link>
		<dc:creator>blackburst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 04:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-3894</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom

I use ur plug heaps, it really is handy, but I found that it heavily affects my framerate in vdmx. My layer fps can go from 30+ fps to around 18-20 when I switch on the plug. Weirdly the framerate is worse when just enabled, then gets better when it&#039;s actually looping or recording. Are you aware of this, is it just something to live with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom</p>
<p>I use ur plug heaps, it really is handy, but I found that it heavily affects my framerate in vdmx. My layer fps can go from 30+ fps to around 18-20 when I switch on the plug. Weirdly the framerate is worse when just enabled, then gets better when it&#8217;s actually looping or recording. Are you aware of this, is it just something to live with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Hi Christian
I&#039;ve just updated the download to include a qcFX - it might work for you as-is, otherwise hopefully it&#039;s a useful start.
holler if you&#039;re still stuck - T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christian<br />
I&#8217;ve just updated the download to include a qcFX &#8211; it might work for you as-is, otherwise hopefully it&#8217;s a useful start.<br />
holler if you&#8217;re still stuck &#8211; T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>hey tom,
i am trying to build a little vdmx plugin that allows me to sample the image of one layer and output it.
how would I go about doing this? I am a bit of a newbie with qc.
,christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey tom,<br />
i am trying to build a little vdmx plugin that allows me to sample the image of one layer and output it.<br />
how would I go about doing this? I am a bit of a newbie with qc.<br />
,christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kriss.cx/tom/2009/09/sampler/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriss.cx/tom/?p=134#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Hi - as long as you&#039;re recording, the current input frame is used for output - ie as frame 1 is recorded, you get frame 1 as output. You should be seeing that behaviour, yes?

You describe a one-frame offset, which you could achieve by putting a Queue patch downstream from the Sampler with a length of 2, and take its oldest frame as output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; as long as you&#8217;re recording, the current input frame is used for output &#8211; ie as frame 1 is recorded, you get frame 1 as output. You should be seeing that behaviour, yes?</p>
<p>You describe a one-frame offset, which you could achieve by putting a Queue patch downstream from the Sampler with a length of 2, and take its oldest frame as output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

